Energy Market Overview, February 2016
Warm weather and a new link to Scandinavia lowered electricity prices in the Baltic States
This time, the market overview presents a summary of how average prices in the Estonian market area, registering EUR 200 as recently as last January, have dropped to EUR 28.28 per megawatt hour and of how much the NordBalt cable between Sweden and Lithuania, stably on the market for the first time, has lowered electricity prices in Latvia and Lithuania.
We share tips on choosing the best electricity purchasing strategy and draw attention to the fact that, in the light of the all-time lowest prices on future transactions, it is sensible precisely now to fix the price of electricity in full or in part.
Explore the topics of this market overview and you will find out why the European Union Member States were allocated free CO2 quotas in February, how much the price of oil rose in February, what kinds of results last financial year brought for Eesti Energia and its subsidiaries, and whether this year for the first time Lithuania really is supplying more gas from the Norwegian Statoil than from Gazprom.
Read more about the topics below
Warm weather and a new link to Scandinavia helped to lower electricity prices in the Baltic States »
The cold weather that ruled North Europe in January eased in February, as a result of which electricity demand declined in Scandinavia and in the Baltic States. A significant reduction in electricity consumption was reflected also in the electricity exchange prices in February, with the average price in the Estonian market area then settling at EUR 28.28 per megawatt hour, having registered hourly prices of EUR 200 as recently as January.
It is worth remembering that the prices cited in this market overview are the statistical hourly averages for the month. When buying electricity, however, it should be taken into account that clients with hour-based metering receive a separate price of electricity for every hour. Every client’s individual average monthly price depends on the distribution of its consumption over the course of the hours of the month: whether it falls mostly on costlier or cheaper hours.
February proved historic for the Baltic electricity market also for the reason that, for the first time during the period of the open electricity market, stable energy trade was conducted via the newly launched NordBalt submarine cable officially still in its testing phase. NordBalt links Lithuania’s electricity systems with Sweden’s. Thanks to the link, February saw Lithuania import cheap electricity produced by nuclear and hydroelectric power plants in Sweden, which helped the market prices in Lithuania and Latvia to drop to their all-time lowest levels on the markets in both countries. Aided by warmer weather, the price of electricity in Latvia and Lithuania worked out to be EUR 29.65 per megawatt hour, translating into a 41 per cent price drop compared to January on these markets.
On 17 February, Lithuania’s electricity transmission system operator Litgrid announced that NordBalt had successfully passed system testing and that from 18 February the submarine cable would enter its test operation phase. This means that 700 megawatts of Swedish electricity was added to the markets in the Baltic States. Since the submarine cable has not been unveiled yet officially, there is no guarantee that the additional transmission capacity will be fully available every day or hour. Nonetheless, 164.5 GWh of electricity was delivered from Sweden to Lithuania in February.
The additional electricity helped prices in Latvia and Lithuania to drop to levels very close to those in Estonia and Finland. In Finland, prices dropped 31%, and our northern neighbours’ monthly average worked out to be EUR 26.09 per megawatt hour.
Change compared to
Minimum Maximum Nord Pool Estonia 28,28 -24,85% 5,24 50,48 Nord Pool Finland 26,09 -31,03% 5,24 50,48 Nord Pool Latvia 29,65 -40,71% 13,72 50,48 Nord Pool Lithuania 29,65 -41,08% 13,72 50,48
Fixed or exchange price: on what basis to select the more suitable purchase strategy? »
When it comes to buying electricity, one of the main forks in the road is the issue of whether to fix the price or leave it dependent on the price dynamics on the electricity exchange. Artur Teesalu, Head of Large Business Customer Services at Eesti Energia, is in daily contact with Eesti Energia’s clients from various business sectors and points out what clients with high electricity consumption have mostly singled out in terms of their decision-making – perhaps these considerations will help you make choices and decide on an electricity purchasing strategy.
1. Estimate what proportion of your business costs are made up of electricity costs
In this respect, a simple way to make a choice is to consider whether costs are a significant portion of your business costs, and if they are, it is likely also important to know or project how high these costs may end up being. As a rule, clients who have estimated their electricity costs to be a significant portion of all their business costs try to fix their electricity prices in order to be able to project their costs in advance. During the current period, fixing prices is a good option in particular for the reason that the prices on forward contracts on the market are at very low levels historically.
2. Consider whether the price of your product or service will be easy to adjust as the price of electricity changes
If you find that the price of your product or service is difficult or nearly impossible to change, it would rather make sense to consider a fixed price of electricity, whereby you will reduce the risk of fixed costs for your company.
3. Take advantage of the situation with forward contracts and fix a low price for the longer term
As a rule, it pays to fix the price when the prices on future contracts for electricity are attractive – as they are, for example, during this period, when prices on future contracts are at extremely low levels historically. In the past couple of months, some of the price drivers for future contracts have moved particularly in a direction favourable to fixing: for example, the price of CO2 has dropped once more. In staying up to date on price movements on the market, you will be assisted by you key account manager at Eesti Energia. For clients currently under electricity contracts at exchange prices, it is worth requesting a quotation for a fixed or partly fixed price.
In case of any questions or quotation requests, do not hesitate to contact your key account manager at Eesti Energia.
Carbon prices nearly at a three-year low »
Carbon prices, which had trending down since January, continued to decline in February. Whereas on the first trading day in January carbon dioxide still cost EUR 8 per tonne, the price had declined to EUR 6 by late January and as low as EUR 4.7 per tonne by mid-February. The month closed at a price of EUR 5.01. This means that by the end of February, the price of CO2 had dropped from the levels of early January by more than 38 per cent.
An overall downward trend on the market of pollutant gases has been caused by a significant reduction in the demand for emission quotas, due to a broad decline on the European and other global energy markets.
In an additional factor, the carbon market was impacted in February by the issue of free quotas for the European Union States, providing the market participants with 535 million free quotas. Some market participants were allocated free quotas for the purposes of helping these mostly industrial companies to remain competitive compared to companies in countries where no environmental regulations as tough as those in the European Union have been introduced.
The price of oil showed signs of recovery in February, Dollar changeable »
Late February witnessed a recovery in the price of Brent crude to a level of USD 35.97 per barrel. This means that February saw the price rise to its highest levels since the beginning of the year. By mid-February, a barrel cost USD 30, whereas a barrel of crude oil could be had on the market for USD 27.9 at the lowest point in January. As recently as early last December, crude oil cost more than USD 40 per barrel, having cost over USD 50 last November. Nevertheless, the price of crude oil remains at a 12-year low.
The decline in the price of crude oil began in mid-2014, when large quantities of oil began to be supplied on the market as part of the shale oil revolution in the United States. This exerted intense pressure on prices, which still topped 100 Dollars per barrel at the time. The drop in the price of oil accelerated; however, the members of OPEC led by Saudi Arabia announced that the oil cartel would not constrain its production. Instead, the cartel accelerated its oil output in order to push smaller producers off the market and hold on to its market share.
Record output volumes together with declining economic activity in China and Europe sent the price of oil into a decline. In January this year, oil prices dropped to the USD 28 mark per barrel, their lowest level since 2003.
In February this year, OPEC announced that diplomatic efforts would be begun in collaboration with external partners, that is, Russia, in order to address the global over-production of oil. On 16 February, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Venezuela and Russia jointly announced that the volume of their oil output would be left at the January level, in other words, that their output would not be increased. As a result of this, the price of Brent crude began to recover and has been rising, with varying success, up to the time of the writing of this market overview, with the price settling at USD 37.4 per barrel.
The rise in the price of oil gained short-term impetus also from movement in the Euro to Dollar ratio last February. Whereas the value of the Euro moved little against the Dollar as a result of the month’s trading, the first half of February saw the Euro appreciate very rapidly, rising from the USD 1.08 level to USD 1.13 on 11 February. The month ended closed at a price of USD 1.09.
News from the Baltic States »
Government of Estonia supports efforts by oil shale industry
On 3 March, the Government of Estonia decided to reduce the operating costs that result for the oil shale industry from national taxes. This sends a signal to companies and creditors that the State wishes to preserve the oil shale industry in Estonia through more flexible action as long as it creates value for the State. The measures linked to the Government’s decision will take effect from 1 July 2016 at the latest.
“We produce electricity and oil from oil shale. These are products whose final prices are shaped on competitive markets. Our competitiveness is directly linked to the production costs of both electricity and oil. To reduce our costs, we have increased the efficiency of production significantly over the course of the year. The decision of the Government will improve the competitiveness of the industry even further and support our efforts to survive a challenging period,” explained Hando Sutter, Chairman of the Management Board of Eesti Energia.
At the proposal of the Ministry of Finance, the Government decided to set the price of oil shale mining rights at a level of EUR 0.275 and the environmental fees, impacting the oil shale industry the most, at the 2009 levels. Eesti Energia also supports the plan of the State to introduce from 2018 a new system of environmental charges dependent on the market price of the final oil shale product, in case of which the oil shale resource charges would be directly linked to the global market prices of liquid fuels, which impact the price of the final products of the oil shale industry. If the market price drops, the resource charges of shale mining will be reduced as well; if, however, the market price rises, under the plan the resource charges will rise above the existing levels.
Eesti Energia earned a net profit of 40 million Euros last year
Eesti Energia’s turnover declined 12%, to 777 million Euros last year. Its operating profit before taxes was 266 million Euros, down 15% from the year before. Its net profit worked out to be 40 million Euros. Andri Avila, Financial Director of Eesti Energia, explained that the lower turnover and profit figures were due to low prices on energy markets.
“Over the past year, we have been making a strenuous effort at Eesti Energia in order to improve the efficiency of the company’s operations and cut its costs,” said Avila. “For instance, we have saved 63 million Euros, or 11%, in business expenses compared to 2014. We have been aided by more efficient solutions, including flexible electricity production at Narva Power Plants, selling more to the wholesale market during the hours of higher prices and less when prices have been low,” Avila elaborated. In 2015, the price of electricity declined 17% in the Estonian region of the Nord Pool electricity exchange, whereas the price of oil on the world market dropped 37%.
Last year, Eesti Energia sold a total of 7.2 TWh of electricity, down 21% from 2014 due to the decline in prices on the electricity market. On its four wind farms, the company produced a total of 223 GWh of electricity, or a third of Estonia’s entire 2015 wind energy output. The Iru waste-to-energy unit produced 270 GWh of heat and 128 GWh of electricity from waste. A record result was achieved with shale oil, 315 000 tonnes of which was sold in 2015. Output from the Enefit280 oil plant accounted for over 40% of the Group’s oil output.
Last year, the Group invested 246 million Euros, down 11% from the year before. The write-downs on the assets of the Auvere Power Plant and the Utah project were 39.6 million Euros and 26 million Euros, respectively. Furthermore, there was a write-down on the 11 million Euros loan provided for the Jordanian oil project. The revaluation of assets reduced Eesti Energia’s net profit by 76 million Euros.
In 2015, Eesti Energia paid its shareholder 62 million Euros in net dividends. 65 million Euros in labour taxes and excise duties, plus 28 million Euros in resource charges and 30 million Euros in pollution charges were contributed to the state budget.
Eesti Energia built the first underground sedimentation lagoon at Estonia mine
Eesti Energia is reducing the environmental impacts of underground mining by constructing a sedimentation lagoon and a pumping station inside exhausted board-and-pillar units at Estonia mine. The large dimensions of the underground sedimentation lagoon extend the time for suspended matter to settle, and water discharged on the ground is of better quality than before. The natural environment is being also conserved for the reason that the need for constructing a sedimentation lagoon on the ground, that is, land under forests or fields, falls away.
The need for the construction of a new sedimentation lagoon and pumping station arose due to the southward movement of mining operations at Estonia mine. Given the objectives of reducing environmental impacts and raising production efficiency, the engineers of Estonia mine designed the pumping station to be located on the eastern flank of the mine and the sedimentation lagoon to lie underground, inside exhausted board-and-pillar units. The maximum volume of the underground settlement lagoon is 1.1 million cubic metres, exceeding twice the volume of the biggest aboveground settlement lagoon. A higher volume enables mining water to be sedimented or treated longer before it is discharged into nature. Constructed underground, the sedimentation lagoon with a surface area of 2 square kilometres frees up valuable space aboveground.
Eesti Energia introduces the biggest buckets in the Baltic States
From this year, Eesti Energia is introducing buckets with higher holding capacity at Narva quarry, raising the efficiency of mining by approximately 10%. Made of light alloy metal, the buckets are the biggest in the Baltic States. At the same time, the company is updating the control systems of its excavators, resulting in an extension of the working life of the machinery by 10 years on average.
“To produce the new bucket, Eesti Energia’s engineers used light allow metals enabling an increase in the holding capacity of the bucket from 15 to 17 cubic metres, whilst reducing the weight of the bucket by 3.5 tonnes. The testing of a bigger bucket currently fitted on a dragline excavator will last for a couple of months, whereupon the plan is to fit updated buckets also on the remaining ten dragline excavators at Narva quarry,” said Andres Vainola, Member of the Management Board of Eesti Energia and Chairman of the Management Board of Eesti Energia Kaevandused AS.
“This project will increase mining efficiency by approximately 10%. With bigger buckets, we can remove the overburden and reach the oil shale layer significantly faster, whereas costs will remain practically at the same levels as before. This way, we will keep the production cost of oil shale at competitive levels, on which, in turn, the production cost of our final products – electricity and oil – depend,” Vainola added.
Lithuania buys more gas from Statoil than Gazprom
This year is exceptional for Lithuania, which is buying less than half the annual quantity of gas from the Russian-owned Gazprom, which has been Lithuania’s sole supplier to date. Launched in Klaipėda a year ago, a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal has enabled Lithuania to supply liquefied natural gas and end the supply of gas from one provider only, which lasted decades.
This year, two Lithuanian companies – LDT and Achema – are supplying from Statoil approximately 1.35 billion cubic metres of gas reaching the terminal on tankers. The remaining quantity, or 0.7 billion cubic metres, are supplied via Gazprom.
Latvia’s support system for electricity production remains the same
The Latvian regulator approved the 2016 support system for electricity production, which will remain the same as in previous years. In February, the Latvian regulator approved the preferential rate of electricity production, left the same as in 2015 and 2014. Accordingly, from 1 April the preferential rate will be EUR 0.02679 per kWh, or EUR 26.79 per MWh.
The market overview has been prepared according to the current market knowledge of the Eesti Energia analyst. The information provided herein is based on public information and sources mentioned in the report. The overview is presented as informative material and on no condition as a promise, proposition, or an official prognosis of Eesti Energia. The opinions presented in the market overview are subject to change and the person presenting them reserves the right to make changes to them. Given the rapidly changing regulation of the electricity market, this market overview or information provided herein is not final and may not comply with situations that may arise in the future. The market overview does not create, end, nor change legal relations (including contracts). Eesti Energia is not liable for any expenses or damages which may occur in relation to the use of the information presented in this market overview.